Fanifesto: Season Tickets
Written by O Storm!   
Monday, 29 March 2010 05:48

pre

The following is a reflection and commentary on my time as a Portland Trailblazers season ticket holder, but it easily applies to anyone who has ever owned season tickets to any professional sports team. NBA? NFL? MLB? NHL? NCAA? Whatever the acronym is for soccer? Different sports, same experiences. Read on and tell me if I'm wrong.

Four seasons ago two friends and I bought a half-season ticket package for the Portland Trailblazers. At that point in franchise history Zach Randolph was the king of Blazerland, Roy and Aldridge were a couple of rookies, and the playoffs were just a gleam in Kevin Pritchard's eye. They were terrible, arguably one of the worst teams in the league and tabbed as the oh-so-clever "Jailblazers". They were so bad that they couldn't even give away tickets, which was a great opportunity for us because we couldn't really afford tickets.

As kids who grew up in a one sport city we were naturally huge Trailblazer fans. Going to a game was a rare luxury. Tickets were saved. Stories were told. Memories were made. Season tickets were nothing more than a dream, something to aspire to when we were old and rich. So, naturally you can imagine our delight when we discovered that season tickets were AFFORDABLE. We were 24 year olds fresh out of college with roommates and mediocre jobs, surely we weren't the kinds of people with season tickets.

But we are! Or, at least we were...

That first season in section 223 was magical. The arena may have been half empty but we didn't care, we had tickets to 21 games, guaranteed. And even though the Rose Garden was half full, the fans that were there were true fans, and we were loud. When expectations are that low any success is met with passionate cheers and support, and the players responded to it. The better they played, the louder we cheered, which made them play even better. And then a funny thing happened, they started winning.

That's when the season ticket holder dream started to die.

We have had season tickets for four years. When we bought the tickets it was with the underlying assumption that we would have these for many, many years. Someday we were going to be bringing our kids to these seats. But, with each winning season came increased expectations, an increased fan base and of course, ticket prices increased to the maximum rate allowed by the NBA.

This is definitely about money, but it's not only about money. It's about respect for the fan.

See, when the Blazers got us as season ticket holders they got what should be their ideal customer. They got passionate, committed, middle class men in their 20's. We encourage other people to buy season tickets, we buy apparel and bumper stickers and merchandise, we adorn our cars and cubicles with Blazer memorabilia, we run a dedicated blog for fans. We have made the Blazers a part of our life. If you were starting a company could you think of a better possible customer? They can think of a better customer and unfortunately it's not us, it's corporate sponsorships who buy seats and use them as a tax write off.

I know this because they've told me. They aggressively court businesses to buy luxury suites and season tickets in the lower level. What better way to impress clients and reward customers than with a trip to a Blazer game? They get a fun night out, the business gets a tax write off, and the Blazers get to increase those ticket prices and cash those checks, while pushing the real fans to the rafters or out of the arena all together.

It makes perfect sense for businesses to buy tickets for those very reasons and I don't blame them one bit, but I do blame the Trailblazers. I blame them for caring about nothing more than the bottom line and marginalizing true fans in the process. When we first started going to games the arena was empty, but we still managed to build an incredible home court advantage. Those fans were loud and passionate because they wanted to be there. They chose to spend their time and money on a Blazer game because they genuinely cared. The Rose Garden became a nightmare for opposing teams, with crowds so deafening that fans would go home with their ears ringing.

That home court advantage has disappeared this season. The Blazers have slipped from the 4th best home record in 2009, to the 14th best home record in 2010 and it's no coincidence. The raucous fans have been replaced with clients from out of town, or with secretaries rewarded for handling an especially stressful month, or with empty seats because the game isn't "big enough" to attract a crowd. It's a joke, and the Blazers have done it to themselves.

Other ticket pricing "innovations" include tiered pricing based on the quality of the opponent, and a price chart with so many different colored sections that it looks like the seating chart is sponsored by Craylola. All of these things help the Blazers bottom line in the short term, but they drastically damage their fan loyalty in the long run. By alienating their loyal fan base and catering to passive fans they have created an unstable business model. Whereas loyal fans like us would buy tickets in both good seasons and bad, fickle fans and businesses won't because they won't be able to justify the wasted expense on an inferior product.

Anyone who pays attention to the NBA has heard the not-so-quiet whispers about an impending lockout stemming from the fact that at least one third of the teams are losing money. And, if they haven't heard the whispers, surely they've turned on a game in Minnesota or Sacramento or Washington or Houston and seen arenas so sparse that they could be confused with the WNBA. They think it can't happen here because the fans are so passionate. That's true, we are passionate, but they no longer want our business.

Golden State had similar passionate fans when they went to the playoffs as an 8th seed and knocked off the Mavericks. They increased their prices in the following years but failed to achieve any measure of success. Their passionate fans are gone and the team is currently for sale. Whoops.

There is a major problem in professional sports, and it stems from the fact that real fans are not coveted and respected by the teams that they support. It's a one sided relationship devised by their own hand. When they're losing they will beg for your eyes, ears and dollars, but when they're winning they jack their prices to the moon and step on your head so that they can get to the big fish that can afford the exorbitant prices.

In our case they could have cashed our checks for the next 40 years. We were built to be lifelong fans who go to games, buy the merchandise and support the team. But they spit in our face, and we won't soon forget it. In the era of I-phones and gamecasts and HD TV's so clear you can see the beads of sweat on Brandon Roy's face it is easier than ever to be a fan without spending a nickel. I don't NEED to go to Blazer games. I'd like to go, but I'd just as soon go to a packed sports bar, a friend's house or my own living room and enjoy the game with the other real fans who couldn't afford tickets.

As a consumer there are more products/events than ever that are vying for your decreasing discretionary dollars, and it is foolish and shortsighted of the Trailblazers to shake down their fans in this manner. It is a business, and their goal is to make money. Their strategy is working right now, but we'll see what happens when the winning stops.

I will always love the Blazers, I just wish they loved me back.




Digg! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!
Comments (42)Add Comment
...
written by Tince, March 29, 2010
What do you expect them to do? I fall in the exact same demographic as you, and while the ticket prices are going to kill me next year, I totally understand. Part of the Blazers success in the future is going to come from them being financially strong in the future. Selling tickets for well below market value and letting scalpers buy 100's of seasons tickets doesn't make sense.
...
written by CollegeWolf, March 29, 2010
Spot on, great post. Too bad things are this way for you (and many other organizations.) It's a shame franchises and front offices don't realize these things that you just wrote. Maybe they will... someday?
...
written by mookie @ A Stern Warning, March 29, 2010
You're not the first I've heard complain about the Blazers' attitude toward fans.

The only thing I can say contrary to this viewpoint is as follows... Paul Allen has put a lot of money into making this franchise successful. He's bought draft picks, bought out deadweight contracts and done lopsided deals to make the Blazers better. None of us complain when he does that for the team to make it better. Of course, this hit (ticket prices) to our pocket is felt much more strongly than it is to Allen's deep pockets, but still we should remember that there are two sides to the coin.

That said, I've been through the exact same scenario with my childhood team -- the Sydney Kings in Australia. The team was a laughingstock for years and then when they pulled out their first title (followed by two more) the ticket prices jumped over night. The fans left and the team won titles in front of empty seats -- sad but true. Ultimately, the Kings folded. Thankfully this season they return to the court with a management team that has hopefully learnt much from the mistakes of their forefathers.
...
written by Don (With Malice), March 29, 2010
Excellent post. A sad end-product of a game becoming a business, and not thinking beyond tomorrow's bottom line.
Because:
In our case they could have cashed our checks for the next 40 years.

And really, beyond that: bringing up your children with the same expectation of attendance - it could be... should be about developing a sustaining community support.

As you intimate, this company 'support' isn't going to be there when the team's not successful - so this line of reasoning for sales is pretty short-sighted.
And here's me - a Lakers fan - thinking that the Blazers were one franchise who appeared to be getting it right when it came to the fans. Shame on them.
...
written by O Storm!, March 29, 2010
@tince. I understand that I initially got the tickets at a discount, and I expected prices to increase. My point with the line "It's about money, but it's not only about money" was meant to emphasize that. The price increases are frustrating, but it's offensive as a fan to have the business side of the sports we love thrust so flagrantly in our face.

Being wrung dry like a bar rag for profit maximization in every facet of my role as a season ticket holder leaves a sour taste in my mouth and taints the experience. That's not the dream of season tickets that you imagine as a child, that's the cold reality of professional sports and that is sad to me as a fan.

The goal of this post was to illicit memories and shared experiences from anyone who has held season tickets for any major sport (like Mookie). I'll bet there are many people with stories to share and similar frustrations.
...
written by Sheed, March 29, 2010
Very nicely done Mr. Storm. I agree with everything and it makes me a little sad just reading it.
...
written by PDX Fan, March 29, 2010
Very well written and I couldn't agree more.
...
written by HolyBackboard, March 29, 2010
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the Blazers still have some of the cheapest ticket prices still in the league.
...
written by TheOdenator, March 29, 2010
@Holybackboard From the most recent information I could find the Blazers have the 8th highest average ticket price as of '08 http://teammarketing.com.ismme...dition.pdf

I don't know how much the price increase is going to be and whether other teams are planning on increasing their prices, so that would change going into next year.
...
written by Goosey McGhee, March 29, 2010
This is just basic economic fundamentals. Have you heard the term "supply and demand"? There's limited supply and TONS of demand therfore it only makes sense to raise ticket prices. You're also paying for a better quality product than you were five years ago when you could score two tickets to four games for only $76.

As they saying goes "you get what you pay for".
...
written by DogPissJones, March 29, 2010
You're worthless O-Storm! I've had it with your anti-Blazer propaganda!

J/k...there is a supply/demand rule here...but the key is the short-sightedness of the Blazers. You have a lot of bandwagon folks who are ready to jump on board with the Blazers right now because it's the "cool" thing to do. These people weren't very big fans 5 years ago.

So once these folks get bored with the Blazers...the true fans are already gone. I just don't think they are looking at the situation very intelligently. It's not like the team has done anything substantial yet.
...
written by DogPissJones, March 29, 2010
oh and one more thing...team apparel seriously went up like 25% from last year.
...
written by O Storm!, March 29, 2010
@Goosey It is supply and demand, and it's the mentality that is driving NBA franchises right out of profitability and the league into a potential lockout.

The rest of the league is not nearly as fortunate as the Trailblazers. Portland is a one professional sports team town with a loyal fan base. By pursuing the same tactics as mid to small market teams (the ones that are losing money), Portland is going down a dangerous path. They could foster a relationship with the fans to build on our loyalty, thus insuring that attendance and support remain high in both good times and bad. Instead they are chasing money now without an eye on the future.

As DPJ points out, they’re catering to the bandwagon fans and doing everything they can to get their money, but they’re alienating their loyal fans in the process. The bandwagon fans will be gone as soon as the winning stops, and if the Blazers aren’t careful they will lose the loyal fans in the process.

It’s not only about money.
...
written by pdxbuckeye, March 29, 2010
@ Goosey Mcgee -- It is all supply and demand. But don't forget about diminishing returns...look at arena sized rock concerts. They used to be commonplace and packed to the rafters. Now fewer people go as ticket prices sky rocket. The fewer people that attend the higher the price needed for a profit.

All of these sorts of activities run this type of risk.
...
written by TheOdenator-too lazy to sign back in, March 29, 2010
Sorry my link died, you can find it at the bottom of this page: http://www.teammarketing.com/b...icle_id=41
...
written by Natsthecat, March 29, 2010
It seems as though it is just the way of the world these days. The Blazers org. is going to set prices that the market will bear. My tickets are exepensive but I checked the prices for the same level in Chicago and their ticket prices are $125 vs $70 here. I scream loud in the 100 level section and am told to hold it down by people who sit in front of me!!!!
Hopefully they will not renew next year. They aren't corportate sponsor ticket holders either!@!!!!!
Anyway, it just seems to me that any business these days takes advantage of a good product. Hopefully the Blazers will continue to play well and win.
The crowd at the RG is very loud when the Blazers are playing well.

When the Blazers come out flat and aren't playing well the crowd is not as loud. Is this different than years past? I have been going to games for 3 yrs as I've just moved to PDX recently.
Please let me know!!!
...
written by O Storm!, March 29, 2010
Chicago is the 3rd largest city in the country with a basketball history founded on six titles in the modern era of the NBA, earned at the hands of the greatest basketball player in the history of the sport and one of the most iconic athletes in the history of the world.

Portland is the 29th largest city in the country and has a single title in 1977 thanks to Bill Walton and an era where the 3-pt line didn't exist.

Supply and demand work much differently in professional sports depending on the individual city. Small and Mid-Market teams don't have the luxury of legions of fans clamoring to attend basketball games. Both physical distance and financial limitations play a large part in attendance figures, whereas your LA's, NY's and Chicagos have very high demand nearly 100% of the time.

This is why the operations strategies of teams like the Blazers must be different than the big market teams. If they resign their practices to the fickle whims of supply and demand then they are doomed.
...
written by Phoenix Sons, March 29, 2010
I agree completely and feel your pain, the Suns have done the same out here in Phoenix. When I do make it to a game, it's not the same as it once was. The "feeling" is gone and the arena is filled with people who could care less about whats going on with the game, and the "die-hard's" are stuck in the rafters or stuck at home not able to afford the game. I hate you Robert Sarver, give it back to Colangelo...
...
written by Runyon, March 29, 2010
When Free Throw Guy isn't there next season, we'll truly know the effect this price bump had.
...
written by Sophia Brugato, March 29, 2010
smilies/sad.gif I love how the team tries all these "portland friendly", liberal-like initiatives such as boasting of the greenist arena, switching to jones soda etc.. but when it comes down to, the blazers as a business are as annoyingly mainstream corporate as they come. I am not a season ticket holder and most likely will not be as I am barely able to afford upper level tickets for my son and i as it is- couple that with the bs comcast deals and it is literally the blazers business model giving the finger to regular fans.

great piece and very well written although, it def. makes me sad, very very sad.

-Sophia
...
written by Joy & Jim, March 29, 2010
Wow - we can relate. We were also in sec 223 - 1/2 way up. We dropped our tics in 2009....BUT those 4 years were AWESOME! We now live in Florida (Gator country) & watch every game on NBA League Pass! We also went to Atlanta, Orlando & Miami to see the boys LIVE! Thanx for a great article - send it to the powers that be.....LOL!
...
written by T-Mac1, March 29, 2010
Look, I wish ticket prices were cheaper. Really, I do. But here's the deal--owning an NBA franchise shouldn't cost you $100,000 per home-game, and that's what Paul Allen had been dealing with as the owner of the team. Things have gotten better, but he's still losing money. Paul Allen isn't from Portland, and he doesn't owe us anything--WE OWE HIM for building this team back up. God forbid, if the Vulcans ever take over completely, the team will either fold or move. Paul Allen is keeping them away with a whip and a chair. Write the man a slightly bigger check and scream your head off at home games.
...
written by Sheed, March 30, 2010
T-Mac,

First off, I'm going to need to see some documentation on that $100k loss per home game statement. I just don't believe it. Plus, even it were true, relatively speaking, that's like me losing $50 per home game. But he still has court side seats, private jets, and everything else we dream about.

I love having Paul Allen as our owner, but we don't owe him anything. He also doesn't owe us anything necessarily. This whole thing is about getting greedy and losing the real fans. Corporate suites and tickets are the LAMEST thing about professional sports. It Makes it all so artificial to be there.

I'm going to make my money and get back in the season ticket game, but I'm not going to like sitting with a bunch of entitled non sports fan A-holes. I may start a fight or get kicked out, especially if CDub is with me.
...
written by O Storm!, March 30, 2010
Exactly!

If CDub is with you it's a certainty smilies/smiley.gif
...
written by GEEZYFBABY, March 30, 2010
Its a little thing called supply and demand
...
written by julio, March 30, 2010
welcome to Miami, home of the fickle fan.
...
written by Sheed, March 30, 2010
I'm not a fan of the arbitrary supply and demand comment. It's so much more than just "supply and demand."
...
written by Hayden Rowe, March 30, 2010
fantastic article! I have noticed the empty seats, not as loud crowds and home struggles. It is pathetic on the organizations side. What is more important to them: Winning or money? obviously money. Even though we have the richest owner in sports. Hopefully the Blazers will stay good enough to not need the fans. But if they became bad again (heaven forbid) will the diehards come running back to their old tickets?

Great article! GO BLAZERS!
...
written by O Storm!, March 30, 2010
If anything, I think the main point of my post is that when professional sports team that aren't in major markets approach attendance and ticket pricing with the simplistic metrics of supply and demand they generate short term profits at the expense of long term success.

NBA teams in small and mid-sized markets are losing money and literally can't give away tickets to fill their arenas. Supply is 100%, demand is 0%. Now what? That suggests to me that there is a problem in casually linking attendance and ticket prices.

Teams need to emphasize community amongst fans, they need to reward and protect the people that invest their dollars and their time in their franchises. They need to find new revenue streams that diversify where their profits come from, so that they aren’t anchored to the profitability that comes from tickets alone.

Admittedly Portland does this better than most. They make valiant efforts to incorporate the community and fans, but without additional revenues they fall prey to the whims of supply and demand and end up alienating the community that they have worked so hard to create.

Maybe they need to allow private parties to use the Blazer logo and player images to design their own apparel? Stephen’s t-shirt designs (Rudylucion!), Bustabucket, and any number of talented local artists could create incredible apparel and merchandise that would appeal to consumers. It would certainly sell better than the stock, boring gear currently available at the Rose Garden. Monetize that. Organize viewing parties at sports bars and restaurants around the city on game days. Monetize that.

“Supply and demand” is the pied piper that has brought professional sports to this point. Someone needs to make a change before it’s too late.
...
written by Macruber, March 30, 2010
I'm starting to look at this thing as one big pendilum (spelling?). Remember back in the day when rip city was rip city. The blazers jacked up the prices of tickets which got my grandpa (who rotated taking grandsons to games) out of buying season tickets. Than they started "Blazer Cable" essentially a fancy pay-per-view for Blazer games. My grandpa purchased that as an alternative. After that the Blazers began their ultimate demise and almost collapsed the whole franchise. Including alienating a true Blazer fan, my grandpa, who dropped blazer cable and didn't think twice about purchasing tickets again.
My point is, most teams will go through periods where they get a few of the right players and can sustain a 5 - 10 year period of good basketball. I can't blame them for trying to take advantage of that window, however, just like the pendilum, it will swing back and Blazer management will be struggling to win back the trust of the true fans they outpriced. Not only does it leave a bitter taste towards management, but it also leaves a bitter taste for the team you love.
The funny thing about loyalty is it goes both ways. As a fan, once you burn that bridge with me it's hard to get me to ford that river and come back. People who are/were scrounging up their pennies to pay for season, half season or quarter season tickets are starting to feel that lack of loyalty. They paid when you were bad and now that you're good you can't show them the same courtesy. It's the ugly middle school girl routine all over again.
I don't know what the answer is, but I know this isn't it. It didn't work before and it won't work again.
Good article O Storm. Mudslides for everyone.
...
written by Erin K, March 30, 2010
Great article and well said!!!!! The half price seats in section 223 are certainly a distant memory!!!!!!
...
written by T-Mac1, March 30, 2010
Do you really want to defend that Paul Allen MAKES money on the Blazers? Really? I mean, there's a lockout coming for a reason, guys. The NBA is a business. A fun business that I care a lot about, but a business. I would prefer if the corporate boxes weren't there, but if that's what it takes for Allen to make money, so be it. Also, who says that people who sit in those boxes aren't "real" fans? I mean, who the fuck has the right to decide who's "legit" enough to call themselves a real blazermaniac? My dad loves the Blazers, but he never gets out of his seat. You want to tell him that he can't come to games because he's not a real fan since all real fans scream their heads off? This is populist saber-rattling.
...
written by Sheed, March 30, 2010
Well this just got a little dramatic didn't it?

No one said your Dad is not a fan, we are referring to corporate seats and corporate suites. Although, if your Dad was sitting behind me in the lower bowl, and I shot up in a fit of joy cheering for the team, and he told me to sit down? I'd tell him to put a lid on it. No discrimination there, just time and place for telling people not to cheer. But I bet your Dad wouldn't do that, if he is in fact a real fan.

The lockout is because of the rest of the NBA, PA is doing better than most owners I'm sure. I don't care if he is making money or not, he's a billionaire and anything under a mil probably doesn't matter much to him. No sympathy here.

Populist saber-rattling? Seems like an attempt to show an intellectual elitist attitude towards people, kind of dramatic phrasing for a basketball discussion, eh?
...
written by T-Mac1, March 30, 2010
My point is that people in corporate boxes can enjoy the game too. Or, to put it another way since "saber-rattling" is elitist, people with money have just as much of a right to be there and watch the game however they want as the people in the upper-deck do. I mean, corporate boxes are awesome. It's a good experience, and if it makes PA money, even better.

This attitude of, "screw him, he's rich and can afford it" doesn't make any sense. No one has given me a reason yet about why he should just sit there and lose money (a million dollars or ten cents) when there are good options available (i.e. boxes) that can help him at least break even, beyond some frustration that good things cost money. Yawn.
...
written by Sheed, March 30, 2010
It's all how you look at the numbers, none of us really know, but last time I checked, PA was doing pretty well financially. So why argue the rich point just to be argumentative?

If you want to have a constructive debate, don't end your comments calling people saber-rattling populists or just saying yawn like a teenager in a chat room. If this is so boring then get back to WOW or whatever it is that floats your boat. You're obviously just being a smartass anyway, so I'll end this conversation.

GO BLAZERS!
...
written by O Storm!, March 30, 2010
T-Mac, did you even read the post and subsequent comments?

"It's about money, but it's about more than that"

This isn't about poor people and rich people and who should be allowed to go to games. It's about the type of fans that the Blazers are catering to and the fact that they are chasing short term money at the expense of long term success. True fans are true fans, I don't care how fat your wallet is. But, courting businesses and corporate sponsors specifically is a business model that has put the NBA in a state of crisis.

This is far from "populist saber rattling", this is a pragmatic discussion about the failures of professional sports and how the alienation of loyal customers is a recipe for disaster. Bring a unique perspective, but don't deride the argument without bothering to understand the message.

I love the NBA and don't want to see a lockout. I'm sure you don't want to either. If you're still "yawning", then you clearly don't understand the discussion.
...
written by Wa, March 30, 2010
I think T-Mac has hit it on the nose though. The argument that the Blazers are chasing short term profits at the expense of long term profits does not bear out logically when you examine the history of the team. Also, while you don't want to make it about money, you have to consider that Paul Allen was worth over $40 billion as recently as 1999, but is now only worth $13.5 billion. At this rate, he will be broke in about twenty years, so cut the guy some slack.

If the team keeps bringing in character players, (as they did in the first thirty years of the franchise, and in the last four seasons), then the fans have shown they will continue to attend games, no matter what the expense. The problem with the empty arena days was more about the character (the lack of that is) of the team, and not the losses. I've seen it in the past. We don't mind if they lose. We will pay to see them lose even. We just want it done with tons of character.

These prices (and future higher prices, should we ever make it to the Western Conference Finals or even the NBA Finals) may keep you away, but they won't keep away the rest of us, who also love the team.
As was said before, you and your friends just lucked out! Hope you enjoyed it while it lasted!
...
written by O Storm!, March 31, 2010
So our packing the stands as fans through the 80's and 90's had nothing to do with our 21 consecutive trips to the playoffs and was all about character? We still seemed to be packing the stands when Ruben Patterson and company were dancing shirtless on the scorer's table.

People stopped coming when we stopped making the playoffs. We want to say it was all about chracter, but it wasn't, it was about winning. We're winning again and now the arena is full again.

Obviously something is wrong with the system as you describe it because more than a third of the league is losing money and a lockout is coming. I think the system is broken, and I think this cycle is a major contributing factor.

Agree to disagree I suppose.

Go Trailblazers!
...
written by Sheed, March 31, 2010
I'm still amused by the argument saying Allen dropped DOWN to net worth 13.5 BILLION. The company I work for is going to sell in June, and I will be out of a job soon after. But I, and other Oregonians, are supposed to feel bad for someone who is worth billions?
...
written by TashaMADDEN34, July 17, 2010
Houses and cars are quite expensive and not everyone is able to buy it. But, personal loans was created to support different people in such kind of situations.
...
written by Replica Rolex Watches, August 27, 2010

Our shop offers many famous Franck Muller Replica Watches. for example:Franck Muller The Conquistador Line Replica Watches,Franck Muller Black King Conquistador Full Diamond, They are all wrist watches and you can buy one for your father to show your love ,moreover. no one could know it a replica one.
...
written by cheap gucci shoes, August 27, 2010
thank you
air max ltd
gucci shoes
nike gucci shoes

Write comment

busy
 

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. Here are some of our high-priority areas that we're specifically looking to grow. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

  1. NBA/Basketball Blogs
  2. NFL Blogs
  3. Major League Baseball Blogs

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!